From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Schmidt Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:28:31 +0000 Subject: Re: [mlmmj] reply-to and reply-to-sender Message-Id: <4CC1917F.1030002@yahoo.com.au> List-Id: References: <1287748105.2377.24.camel@mbs-laptop> In-Reply-To: <1287748105.2377.24.camel@mbs-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org Did it help? In a future release, I hope to include a bunch of sensible defaults for this kind of stuff, to make it easier for people to get it right. Or at the very least, include a list of best practices in the documentation. Ben. On 23/10/10 12:25 AM, Morten Bressendorff Schmidt wrote: > Thx Ben > > Did that just a couple of minutes ago ;) > > ./morten > > > On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 00:23 +1100, Ben Schmidt wrote: >> IIRC, the Reply-To header is meant to mean what to reply to when >> replying to the sender. It is designed to be set by the sender, not by >> the list, to indicate they want replies to them sent elsewhere. >> >> (Many lists set a Reply-To header though. This can make sense if there's >> never really any reason to reply to the sender, but it's still not >> technically correct, and many people recommend against it.) >> >> To get a reply-to-list behaviour, you should include a List-Post header >> (and other List-* headers are also recommended). >> >> RFC2369, RFC2919. >> >> Ben. >> >> >> >> On 22/10/10 10:48 PM, Morten Bressendorff Schmidt wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> It's probably me... but... >>> >>> mlmmj ubuntu-package 1.2.17-1.1 >>> >>> If I set "Reply-To" to be the mailinglist created, then replies go to >>> the list.... fine! >>> >>> But when I use "Reply to sender" in my mailprograms, the reply still >>> goes to the mailinglist, not to the person who actually wrote the >>> mail... >>> >>> Is what I wan't possible? >>> >>> ./morten >>> >>> >>> >>> > > >