Hi Mika,

On 10/22/2010 09:21 AM, Mika.Liljeberg(a)nokia.com wrote:
> Hi Denis,
> 
>>> Thanks. Still, I'd vote for a common checkpatch script in 
>> the oFono tree. ;)
>>>
>>
>> Are you volunteering to maintain such a beast and make sure 
>> it is up to
>> date with the kernel upstream version?
> 
> Only if I get to decide on the coding style. Otherwise, I'm proposing you guys should do it. Anyway, this is just a friendly suggestion in with the o sav e everyone's time.
> 

Nice try ;)

>> Yes, so let me give you a case where your approach breaks:
>>
>> Set the RAT property, then run two GetProperties at the same 
>> time.  You
>> end up querying FastDormancy twice.
> 
> No you won't, because the second GetProperties query will be terminated right off the bat with ofono busy error. Again, see here:
>

I really don't want to argue about this.

SetProperty("TechnologyPreference", ..)
-> Sets RADIO_SETTINGS_MODE_CACHED

GetProperties() -> queries Fast dormancy
GetProperties() -> queries Fast dormancy
->

+	} else if (rs->driver->query_fast_dormancy) {
+		rs->driver->query_fast_dormancy(rs,
+					fast_dormancy_query_callback, rs);
+		dbus_message_unref(reply);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+

You never set pending in the FastDormancy case.

> 
> Understandable. Makes it difficult to improve on design patterns that have already been replicated, though.
> 

Nobody is against improving things, but please try to do it in the
appropriate forum.  E.g. and RFC to the mailing list or an IRC discussion.

Regards,
-Denis