All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
To: Peter Pastor <peter.pastor@domain.hid>, Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Slow hard drive access in xenomai
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:40:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC5DD1F.4090405@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimS7-CEvA74Viwu4mLm9-O_NpakXYG7=FXK1L1f@domain.hid>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2480 bytes --]

Am 25.10.2010 21:03, Peter Pastor wrote:
> Hey Jan,
> 
> I did not apply any ubuntu patch for kernel 2.6.35 (since I do not have
> one).  Also, good to know that I should not use xenomai patches together
> with ubuntu patches.
> 
> Anyway, the problem occurred as well with the kernel 2.6.35 (see attached
> dmesg_bad_2.6.35)
> I also attached the config.
> 

...

> [ 5751.714643] irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> [ 5751.714649] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: P            2.6.35-ipipe-2.5.4-slim #2
> [ 5751.714653] Call Trace:
> [ 5751.714655]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff8108bb56>] __report_bad_irq+0x26/0xa0
> [ 5751.714668]  [<ffffffff8108bd5c>] note_interrupt+0x18c/0x1d0
> [ 5751.714672]  [<ffffffff8108c77d>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xcd/0x100
> [ 5751.714677]  [<ffffffff8100656d>] handle_irq+0x1d/0x30
> [ 5751.714681]  [<ffffffff81005a40>] do_IRQ+0x70/0x100
> [ 5751.714685]  [<ffffffff81092147>] __ipipe_sync_stage+0x207/0x20d
> [ 5751.714689]  [<ffffffff810059d0>] ? do_IRQ+0x0/0x100
> [ 5751.714692]  [<ffffffff8109214d>] ? __xirq_end+0x0/0x9c
> [ 5751.714696]  [<ffffffff810059d0>] ? do_IRQ+0x0/0x100
> [ 5751.714700]  [<ffffffff810926a3>] __ipipe_walk_pipeline+0x113/0x120
> [ 5751.714706]  [<ffffffff81024414>] __ipipe_handle_irq+0x124/0x310
> [ 5751.714708]  [<ffffffff8108bf10>] ? __ipipe_ack_fasteoi_irq+0x0/0x10
> [ 5751.714712]  [<ffffffff814f78d3>] common_interrupt+0x13/0x2c
> [ 5751.714713]  <EOI>  [<ffffffff810249d6>] ? __ipipe_halt_root+0x26/0x40
> [ 5751.714718]  [<ffffffff81061191>] ? atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x11/0x20
> [ 5751.714722]  [<ffffffff8100cbd5>] default_idle+0x45/0x50
> [ 5751.714725]  [<ffffffff8100198a>] cpu_idle+0x7a/0xd0
> [ 5751.714728]  [<ffffffff814f14a1>] start_secondary+0x1c1/0x1c5
> [ 5751.714730] handlers:
> [ 5751.714730] [<ffffffff8136ed60>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0xb0)
> [ 5751.714735] [<ffffffffa00bac30>] (mpt_interrupt+0x0/0xa00 [mptbase])
> [ 5751.714747] Disabling IRQ #16

I'm not yet sure, but a first thought: We have a shared fasteoi IRQ
here, and we are on SMP. Compared to vanilla, the fasteoi flow of ipipe
looks so much different to me ATM that I tend to believe two cores end
up having this IRQ queued at the same time. One runs first and handles
all triggers, the second bails out like above.

Philippe, we _end_ fasteoi in the ipipe ack path. Do we mask them prior
to this? What prevents a second IRQ arriving after this early eoi?

Jan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 259 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-25 19:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-22 21:32 [Xenomai-help] Slow hard drive access in xenomai Peter Pastor
2010-10-22 22:06 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-10-24  7:19   ` Peter Pastor
2010-10-26  5:22     ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-10-28 19:20       ` Peter Pastor
2010-11-02 12:30         ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-11-02 15:24           ` Peter Pastor
2010-11-02 22:30             ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
     [not found]   ` <AANLkTimyj5TRgan5nE5ey6h8-WO_-na=U66si-e9Xx9F@mail.gmail.com>
2010-10-24 15:08     ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-10-24 19:51       ` Peter Pastor
2010-10-24 20:40         ` Peter Pastor
2010-10-25  6:19           ` Eric Noulard
2010-10-25 10:47             ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-10-25 11:14               ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-25 16:10                 ` Peter Pastor
2010-10-25 16:10                 ` Peter Pastor
2010-10-25 16:24                   ` Eric Noulard
2010-10-25 18:04                     ` Peter Pastor
2010-10-25 18:13                       ` Eric Noulard
2010-10-25 18:15                       ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-25 19:03                         ` Peter Pastor
2010-10-25 19:40                           ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2010-10-25 20:28                             ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-25 21:10                               ` Peter Pastor
2010-10-25 21:21                             ` Philippe Gerum
2010-10-25 21:26                               ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-25 21:33                                 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-25 21:43                                 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-10-26  0:58                                   ` Peter Pastor
2010-10-26  5:20                                   ` Jan Kiszka
2010-10-25 16:13                 ` Peter Pastor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CC5DD1F.4090405@domain.hid \
    --to=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
    --cc=peter.pastor@domain.hid \
    --cc=rpm@xenomai.org \
    --cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.