From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
"Neubauer, Wojciech" <Wojciech.Neubauer@intel.com>,
"Kwolek, Adam" <adam.kwolek@intel.com>,
"Labun, Marcin" <Marcin.Labun@intel.com>,
"Ciechanowski, Ed" <ed.ciechanowski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] md/raid5: skip wait for MD_CHANGE_DEVS acknowledgement in the external case
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:20:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC68139.7010700@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101026162243.263a96ae@notabene>
On 10/25/2010 10:22 PM, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:03:54 -0700
> Dan Williams<dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> mdmon is orchestrating the reshape progress and we rely on it to manage the
>> reshape position and metadata updates.
>>
>> Reported-by: Adam Kwolek<adam.kwolek@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams<dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/md/raid5.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
>> index 69b0a16..9e8ecd5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
>> @@ -4243,7 +4243,7 @@ static sector_t reshape_request(mddev_t *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, int *skipped
>> set_bit(MD_CHANGE_DEVS,&mddev->flags);
>> md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
>> wait_event(mddev->sb_wait, mddev->flags == 0 ||
>> - kthread_should_stop());
>> + !mddev->persistent || kthread_should_stop());
>> spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
>> conf->reshape_safe = mddev->reshape_position;
>> spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
>> @@ -4344,8 +4344,8 @@ static sector_t reshape_request(mddev_t *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, int *skipped
>> set_bit(MD_CHANGE_DEVS,&mddev->flags);
>> md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
>> wait_event(mddev->sb_wait,
>> - !test_bit(MD_CHANGE_DEVS,&mddev->flags)
>> - || kthread_should_stop());
>> + !test_bit(MD_CHANGE_DEVS,&mddev->flags) ||
>> + !mddev->persistent || kthread_should_stop());
>> spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
>> conf->reshape_safe = mddev->reshape_position;
>> spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
>
>
> Do we really need this?
Sorry, not anymore, this patch predated the md_update_sb() rework and is
no longer needed as far as I can see.
--
Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-26 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-22 18:03 [PATCH 0/2] reshape fixlets for 2.6.37 Dan Williams
2010-10-22 18:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] md/raid5: skip wait for MD_CHANGE_DEVS acknowledgement in the external case Dan Williams
2010-10-26 5:22 ` Neil Brown
2010-10-26 7:20 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2010-10-22 18:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] md/raid5: initialize ->recovery_offset when growing raid_disks Dan Williams
2010-10-26 5:35 ` Neil Brown
2010-10-26 7:26 ` Dan Williams
2010-10-26 7:54 ` Neil Brown
2010-10-26 8:43 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CC68139.7010700@intel.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=Marcin.Labun@intel.com \
--cc=Wojciech.Neubauer@intel.com \
--cc=adam.kwolek@intel.com \
--cc=ed.ciechanowski@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.