All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-am33-list@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Akira Takeuchi <takeuchi.akr@jp.panasonic.com>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MN10300: Fix the PERCPU() alignment to allow for workqueues
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:27:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC6C941.2080003@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CC6C62F.1000804@kernel.org>

On 10/26/2010 02:14 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> That said, I think it might be better to just remove the alignment parameter
>>> from the macro and force align to PAGE_SIZE.
>>
>> That's not necessarily good.  Two arches to note:
>>
>> 	arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S:  PERCPU(THREAD_SIZE)
> 
> I don't think the current percpu allocator honors alignment larger
> than PAGE_SIZE no matter how large the alignment for the percpu output
> section is.  I'll look into it deeper but I think we might just have
> been lucky and the alignment somehow didn't bite us yet.  The only
> user of THREAD_SIZE mask at this point seems to be cpu_init().  Maybe
> we can remove this requirement.  I'll look into it.

Okay, this was added by commit fe8e0c2 in this merge window.  It's
broken and needs to be reverted.  I'll send a patch to revert it.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-26 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-25 22:41 [PATCH] MN10300: Fix the PERCPU() alignment to allow for workqueues David Howells
2010-10-26  9:10 ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 10:22   ` David Howells
2010-10-26 12:14     ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 12:27       ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-10-26 12:45         ` [PATCH] x86, percpu: revert commit fe8e0c25 Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 13:25           ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-26 13:34             ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 13:49               ` Brian Gerst
2010-10-26 15:08                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27  5:43                   ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Brian Gerst
2010-10-27  6:07                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27  9:57                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-27 13:33                         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 13:42                           ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 13:57                             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:00                               ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 14:24                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:39                                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 14:39                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 14:43                                     ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 15:21                                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 15:35                                         ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 16:07                                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-27 17:33                                             ` [PATCH] numa: fix slab_node(MPOL_BIND) Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 15:59                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2010-10-28 16:27                                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 16:45                                                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-10-28 16:55                                                 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-28 21:07                                                   ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-29 14:55                                                     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-27 20:55                                           ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 12:01                                             ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-28 12:30                                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-28 14:40                         ` [PATCH] x86-32: NUMA irq stacks allocations Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29  6:43                           ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86-32: Restore irq stacks NUMA-aware allocations tip-bot for Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 18:32                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-29 20:09                               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:28                               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:53                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 20:59                                   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-29 20:58                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 21:21                                   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-10-27 15:19                     ` [PATCH] x86-32: Allocate irq stacks seperate from percpu area Linus Torvalds
2010-10-27 15:30                       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 15:33                         ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 15:40                           ` Tejun Heo
2010-10-27 15:43                             ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-27 16:03                     ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Brian Gerst
2010-10-27 16:04                     ` [tip:x86/urgent] percpu: Remove the multi-page alignment facility tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2010-10-26 14:06           ` [RFC PATCH] percpu: always align percpu output section to PAGE_SIZE Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  6:46             ` [Uclinux-dist-devel] " Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24  6:46               ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24  8:25               ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:25                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:51                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:51                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24 13:46                   ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 13:46                     ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-24 17:51                     ` Tejun Heo
2011-03-24  8:54             ` [PATCH UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2010-10-26 14:50       ` [PATCH] MN10300: Fix the PERCPU() alignment to allow for workqueues David Howells
2010-10-26 14:56         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CC6C941.2080003@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-am33-list@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=takeuchi.akr@jp.panasonic.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.