From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: OLPC: add OLPC device-tree support (v3)
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:41:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC83A10.8090607@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101027101933.GD6797@angua.secretlab.ca>
On 10/27/2010 03:19 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 03:58:46PM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
>>
>> Make use of PROC_DEVICETREE to export the tree, and sparc's PROMTREE code to
>> call into OLPC's Open Firmware to build the tree.
>>
>> v3: rename olpc_prom to olpc_dt
>> - rework Kconfig entries
>> - drop devtree build hook from proc, instead adding a call to x86's
>> paging_init (similarly to how sparc64 does it)
>> - switch allocation from using slab to alloc_bootmem. this allows
>> the DT to be built earlier during boot (during setup_arch); the
>> downside is that there are some 1200 bootmem reservations that are
>> done during boot. Not ideal..
>> - add a helper olpc_ofw_is_installed function to test for the
>> existence and successful detection of OLPC's OFW.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
>
> Overall this patch looks fine, but it needs to be acked from the x86
> maintainers, and I'd like it to have a cycle through linux-next before
> it gets merged, so that means 2.6.38 because the 2.6.37 merge window
> has already been open for almost a week.
>
Right... which means that our attention is going to be elsewhere for a
bit -- probably until after KS/LPC. Sorry, just immediate
prioritization and nothing to do with the relative importance.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-27 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-22 22:58 [PATCH] x86: OLPC: add OLPC device-tree support (v3) Andres Salomon
2010-10-22 22:58 ` Andres Salomon
2010-10-23 0:22 ` [PATCH] x86: OLPC: speed up device tree creation during boot Andres Salomon
2010-10-23 0:22 ` Andres Salomon
2010-10-27 10:39 ` Grant Likely
2010-10-27 10:39 ` Grant Likely
2010-10-27 17:50 ` Andres Salomon
2010-10-27 17:50 ` Andres Salomon
2010-10-27 10:19 ` [PATCH] x86: OLPC: add OLPC device-tree support (v3) Grant Likely
2010-10-27 10:19 ` Grant Likely
2010-10-27 13:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-10-27 13:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-10-27 14:41 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2010-10-27 17:48 ` Andres Salomon
2010-10-27 17:48 ` Andres Salomon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CC83A10.8090607@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=dilinger@queued.net \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.