From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Xen updates Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:29:32 -0700 Message-ID: <4CC87D9C.3070908@goop.org> References: <4CC7681B.9060301@goop.org> <528869330.20101027105603@eikelenboom.it> <1288170828.8361.161.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <266556691.20101027115009@eikelenboom.it> <61405929.20101027172904@eikelenboom.it> <1858642776.20101027212236@eikelenboom.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1858642776.20101027212236@eikelenboom.it> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Sander Eikelenboom Cc: Ian Campbell , "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 10/27/2010 12:22 PM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > Yes this enables the msi(-x) interrupts ! Thanks > I will give the problem with the bios option another try as well. > > What i was wondering .. though .. > Devices using normal interrupts generally get a low IRQ number > Devices with MSI a higher, but MSI-X seem to get a low IRQ number as well, is this expected ? I think that's showing you what gsi you would get if you weren't using msi. What does /proc/interrupts show? J