From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Juergen Gross Subject: Re: [PATCH] avoid numa placement of cpus with active cpupools Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:31:00 +0200 Message-ID: <4CC8FC84.1080109@ts.fujitsu.com> References: <55538c59d637fda3ec4a.1288093929@nehalem1> <19656.20267.209209.817343@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <19656.20267.209209.817343@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Jackson Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 10/27/10 18:11, Ian Jackson wrote: > Juergen Gross writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] avoid numa placement of cpus with active cpupools"): >> When using cpupools don't pin vcpus to numa nodes as this might >> conflict with the cpupool definition. >> numa placement should be handled by cpupool configuration instead. > > JOOI (and without looking at libxl to check) does this need a > corresponding patch for libxl ? No, libxl doesn't include any numa related cpu placement up to now. Juergen -- Juergen Gross Principal Developer Operating Systems TSP ES&S SWE OS6 Telephone: +49 (0) 89 3222 2967 Fujitsu Technology Solutions e-mail: juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com Domagkstr. 28 Internet: ts.fujitsu.com D-80807 Muenchen Company details: ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html