From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from starfish.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.166]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PBUWA-00049J-R8 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:35:56 +0200 Received: (qmail 19455 invoked by uid 1003); 28 Oct 2010 15:35:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.17.17.165?) (philip@opensdr.com@217.206.93.210) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 28 Oct 2010 15:35:04 -0000 Message-ID: <4CC99826.9050805@balister.org> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:35:02 +0100 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100921 Fedora/3.1.4-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-members@lists.openembedded.org, openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 216.168.135.166 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: philip@balister.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: OEDEM Agenda X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:35:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I've taken a quick stab at organizing the agenda for OEDEM. The only thing I feel strongly about is getting the General Assembly over with first. The only agenda item for the General Assembly that could be time consuming is the online voting procedure. If anyone has strong feelings on the online voting, it would be good to bring a written suggestion. The current system is not perfect, but it does work and has been tested so it does not get into situations that lead to no clear result. If there are no concrete ideas for the GA to discuss, I would suggest that interested parties volunteer to do some research into online voting processes and make suggestions. Please review the agenda and make suggestions. This a meeting for everyone to participate in. Emailed thoughts are welcome. I left the times flexible after the first couple of items. Philip PS: And once again, a big thanks to Intel for arranging for the meeting room.