From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nils.faerber@kernelconcepts.de (Nils Faerber) Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:56:59 +0200 Subject: New Kirkwood board support In-Reply-To: <20101028194306.GL3122@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <4CC9C245.3030906@kernelconcepts.de> <20101028190133.GC31158@pengutronix.de> <4CC9D0A3.70204@kernelconcepts.de> <20101028194306.GL3122@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <4CC9D58B.5040006@kernelconcepts.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am 28.10.2010 21:43, schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 09:36:03PM +0200, Nils Faerber wrote: >> +MACHINE_START(TK71, "TK71 Kirkwood based Q7 formfactor board") >> + /* Maintainer: Nils Faerber */ >> + .phys_io = KIRKWOOD_REGS_PHYS_BASE, >> + .io_pg_offst = ((KIRKWOOD_REGS_VIRT_BASE) >> 18) & 0xfffc, > > The reason you don't want this is because these have been removed > during this merge window already, so merging this code as-is into > current mainline won't build. Ah, I see, so this still valid for 2.6.36 (which I have in my tree) but not for upcoming 2.6.37? OK, this makes perfect sense. Then I have to get myself a more recent tree first so that I can make a patch against it - it looks to me that I just have to remove those two and everything is shiny again ;) I will do so tomorrow. Cheers nils -- kernel concepts GbR Tel: +49-271-771091-12 Sieghuetter Hauptweg 48 D-57072 Siegen Mob: +49-176-21024535 http://www.kernelconcepts.de