From: Pierluigi Passaro <pierluigi.passaro@phoenixsoftware.it>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: external-toolchain-csl and libtool 2.4
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:29:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CCA93E5.3070008@phoenixsoftware.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimYkjGN62vRYHTZD2ykW5X_uP=oUGpOvhbbzd4G@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for your patches, however the problem is still reproducible
building libusb-compat with codesourcery toolchain: for some reason, the
rpath flag is pointing to /usr/lib instead of $lt_sysroot/usr/lib.
The rpath flag, usually not present, is introduced cause generating a
".lo" file.
Any suggestion?
Following the final part of the log
| /bin/sh ../arm-none-linux-gnueabi-libtool --tag=CC --mode=link
arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv7-a -mtune=cortex-a8 -mfpu=neon
-mfloat-abi=softfp -mthumb-interwork -mno-thumb -fvisibility=hidden
-std=gnu99 -fgnu89-inline -Wall -Wundef -Wunused -Wstrict-prototypes
-Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Wno-pointer-sign -Wshadow
-I/home/gigi/code/tmp/sysroots/armv7a-none-linux-gnueabi/usr/include/libusb-1.0
-isystem/home/gigi/code/tmp/sysroots/armv7a-none-linux-gnueabi/usr/include
-fexpensive-optimizations -frename-registers -fomit-frame-pointer -O2
-ggdb2 -version-info 8:4:4 -release 0.1 -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -o
libusb.la -rpath /usr/lib libusb_la-core.lo -lusb-1.0
| arm-none-linux-gnueabi-libtool: link: arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc
-march=armv7-a -mtune=cortex-a8 -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp
-mthumb-interwork -mno-thumb -shared -fPIC -DPIC
.libs/libusb_la-core.o -lusb-1.0 -march=armv7-a -mtune=cortex-a8
-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp -mthumb-interwork -mno-thumb -O2 -Wl,-O1
-Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,-soname -Wl,libusb-0.1.so.4 -o
.libs/libusb-0.1.so.4.4.4
|
/opt/codesourcery/arm-2010q1/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/4.4.1/../../../../arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/ld:
cannot find -lusb-1.0
| collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
| make[2]: *** [libusb.la] Error 1
| make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/gigi/code/tmp/work/armv7a-none-linux-gnueabi/libusb-compat-1_0.1.3-r0/libusb-compat-0.1.3/libusb'
| make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/gigi/code/tmp/work/armv7a-none-linux-gnueabi/libusb-compat-1_0.1.3-r0/libusb-compat-0.1.3'
| make: *** [all] Error 2
| FATAL: oe_runmake failed
| ERROR: Function do_compile failed
NOTE: package libusb-compat-1_0.1.3-r0: task do_compile: Failed
ERROR: TaskFailed event exception, aborting
ERROR: Build of
/home/gigi/code/import/openembedded/recipes/libusb/libusb-compat_0.1.3.bb
do_compile failed
ERROR: Task 1885
(/home/gigi/code/import/openembedded/recipes/libusb/libusb-compat_0.1.3.bb,
do_compile) failed with 256
Waiting for 1 active tasks to finish:
1: gettext-native-0.18-r3 do_configure (pid 2450)
ERROR:
'/home/gigi/code/import/openembedded/recipes/libusb/libusb-compat_0.1.3.bb'
failed
NOTE: package gettext-native-0.18-r3: task do_configure: Succeeded
ERROR:
'/home/gigi/code/import/openembedded/recipes/libusb/libusb-compat_0.1.3.bb'
failed
ERROR:
'/home/gigi/code/import/openembedded/recipes/libusb/libusb-compat_0.1.3.bb'
failed
Khem Raj wrote:
> I have posted a patch to address this issue please try that out
>
> On 10/22/10, Pierluigi Passaro <pierluigi.passaro@phoenixsoftware.it> wrote:
>
>> Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Pierluigi Passaro
>>> <pierluigi.passaro@phoenixsoftware.it> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> LIBTOOL_HAS_SYSROOT feature has been recently enabled on Angstom 2010.x
>>>> distro.
>>>>
>>>> However, using CodeSourcery toolchain, this feature lead to use CSL
>>>> sysroot
>>>> as search path, that is generally different from
>>>> ${STAGING_DIR_TARGET}${libdir} folder used for packages.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> hmmm yes I see the problem. Right now its left upto the compile to provide
>>> the sysroot which works well with internal toolchain but will not work
>>> with
>>> external toolchains or the compilers which dont support --print-sysroot
>>> option
>>>
>>> I will come up with a patch so specify the sysroot for libtool so that it
>>> does not rely upon the compiler to compute it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I'm not expert of libtool mechanisms but please let me know I can
>> provide any support.
>>
>>>> At present I worked around the problem with the attached patch, but I was
>>>> wondering if this could be a misconfiguration or a bug.
>>>>
>>>> Any suggestion will be appreciated.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> With libtool 2.4 I dont see a reason to disable sysroot. The variable is
>>> only
>>> provided to keep libtool 2.2.6 functional as same time. So when using 2.4
>>> please
>>> do not disable the sysroot feature.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I agree with you, I will just keep the patch for personal use, until
>> libtool will not rely on CSL compiler to compute sysroot.
>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Gigi
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ing. Pierluigi Passaro
>>>> Viale Don Luigi Sturzo 34
>>>> 30174 Venezia Mestre
>>>> Cel: +39 348 355 4119
>>>> Tel: +39 041 862 3373
>>>> Fax: +39 041 862 3173
>>>> Web: www.phoenixsoftware.it
>>>> P.IVA 03884060272
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>>>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-29 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-21 23:02 external-toolchain-csl and libtool 2.4 Pierluigi Passaro
2010-10-22 20:49 ` Khem Raj
2010-10-22 21:31 ` Pierluigi Passaro
2010-10-23 5:04 ` Khem Raj
2010-10-29 9:29 ` Pierluigi Passaro [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CCA93E5.3070008@phoenixsoftware.it \
--to=pierluigi.passaro@phoenixsoftware.it \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.