From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@free.fr>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH RFC 0/3] ARM Relocation Config Cleanup
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:22:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CCAAE5D.3040000@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101029101319.A1044134F44@gemini.denx.de>
Le 29/10/2010 12:13, Wolfgang Denk a ?crit :
> Dear Reinhard Meyer,
>
> In message<4CCA87B9.5090203@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote:
>> Dear Wolfgang Denk,
>>> Dear Reinhard Meyer,
>>>
>>> In message<4CC9E2A7.3080506@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote:
>>>>> Replace CONFIG_RELOC_FIXUP_WORKS by CONFIG_BROKEN_RELOC_FIXUP
>>>> Seems a slight misnomer to me, and a bit hides what it really does. What about
>>>> CONFIG_NEEDS_DATA_RELOC_FIXUP ?
>>>
>>> Thinking about that, I feel the name is too long. And eventually not
>>> clear enough either.
>>>
>>> How about CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC ?
>> OK, since I had that in mind, too. I skipped it however since "manual" for me
>> smells like really some extra manual labour.
>> But I guess any full descriptive term would be too long.
>
> Yes, that's what I think too.
>
> OK, renamed into CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC.
Wait... This is the other way around, isn't it? When a board defines
CONFIG_RELOC_FIXUP_WORKS, it means "no need to do manual fixups", I think.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-29 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-28 19:12 [U-Boot] [PATCH RFC 0/3] ARM Relocation Config Cleanup Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28 19:12 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH RFC 1/3] Replace CONFIG_RELOC_FIXUP_WORKS by CONFIG_BROKEN_RELOC_FIXUP Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-29 19:43 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28 19:12 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH RFC 2/3] Drop support for CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-29 19:43 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28 19:12 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH RFC 3/3] Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-29 19:44 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-28 20:52 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH RFC 0/3] ARM Relocation Config Cleanup Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-28 21:22 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-29 5:49 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-29 8:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-29 8:37 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-29 10:13 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-29 11:22 ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
2010-10-29 11:30 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2010-10-29 11:44 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-29 5:42 ` Heiko Schocher
2010-10-29 10:50 ` Reinhard Meyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CCAAE5D.3040000@free.fr \
--to=albert.aribaud@free.fr \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.