From: Eli Billauer <eli@billauer.co.il>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: open() on /dev/tty takes 30 seconds on 2.6.36
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 09:47:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CCBCD8E.1020601@billauer.co.il> (raw)
Hello,
I'm sorry about my previous overconclusive email, but there is a real
problem with opening TTYs during a few minutes after a system boots
(Fedora 12 in my case). I'll stick to the facts this time.
The kernel involved is 2.6.36, downloaded a few days ago as "latest
stable kernel" at kernel.org.
Running strace on sshd with -T and -tt flags, hence showing the time
each call took, these two lines were found. The number in brackets is
the time the system call took (not to the time to the next call or
something).
...
21:35:21.131436 open("/dev/tty", O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY) = -1 ENXIO (No such
device or address) <30.022532>
...
21:35:51.175642 open("/dev/pts/0", O_RDWR) = 4 <30.063213>
...
So it took 30 seconds just to fail opening /dev/tty.
I then went on to add printk's in pty.c. Among others, I had:
static int ptmx_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
{
struct tty_struct *tty;
int retval;
int index;
nonseekable_open(inode, filp);
/* find a device that is not in use. */
printk(KERN_ALERT "34: ptmx_open to lock\n");
tty_lock();
printk(KERN_ALERT "35: ptmx_open locked\n");
[snipped here]
And then found in my /var/log/messages (no log lines between these two):
Oct 29 16:14:58 ocho kernel: 34: ptmx_open to lock
Oct 29 16:15:13 ocho kernel: 35: ptmx_open locked
So we can see it took 15 seconds to acquire a lock in this case. In all
other pairs of lock messages there was no time difference. To me it
looks like 15 seconds in order to acquire a lock in the kernel is a
smoking gun.
Please look into this.
Eli
--
Web: http://www.billauer.co.il
next reply other threads:[~2010-10-30 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-30 7:47 Eli Billauer [this message]
2010-10-30 18:46 ` open() on /dev/tty takes 30 seconds on 2.6.36 Andrew Morton
2010-10-30 20:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-31 0:20 ` Eli Billauer
2010-10-31 3:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-10-31 6:34 ` James Cloos
2010-10-31 11:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-02 10:28 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-01 1:12 ` Eli Billauer
2010-11-01 19:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-01 20:46 ` Alan Cox
2010-11-03 0:15 ` Eli Billauer
2010-11-03 3:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-03 10:34 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CCBCD8E.1020601@billauer.co.il \
--to=eli@billauer.co.il \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.