From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51780 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PCyiI-000074-7D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:02:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PCyiG-00073b-SG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:02:34 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com ([209.85.210.45]:38841) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PCyiG-00073P-MJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:02:32 -0400 Received: by pzk4 with SMTP id 4so651397pzk.4 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:02:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CCF00B5.9030406@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:02:29 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] spice config options References: <1286536926-25378-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <4CCEE51A.1020703@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4CCEE51A.1020703@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 11/01/2010 11:04 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On 10/08/10 13:22, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This patch series adds a bunch of config options to spice, most notably >> it enables to configure TLS and thus using spice encrypted. The commit >> messages are not that verbose, but every patch comes with a patch chunk >> updating the spice section in the documentation. Please look there when >> reviewing the patches. >> >> Changes in v2: >> * Some code style fixups. >> * s/allways/always/ spell fix in documentation. >> * more verbose commit message. >> >> The patches are also available in the git repository at: >> >> git://anongit.freedesktop.org/spice/qemu config.2 > > Ping? Sorry if I wasn't clear before, but for the spice stuff moving forward, just do a PULL request. I assumed that the series outside of the an explicit PULL was an RFC. I'll merge these immediately though. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > cheers, > Gerd >