All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: Allow host IRQ sharing for passed-through PCI 2.3 devices
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 10:15:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CD1284F.7070003@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101103090550.GG6772@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1324 bytes --]

Am 03.11.2010 10:05, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 09:51:10AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Am 03.11.2010 09:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 09:11:16AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>>>>
>>>> PCI 2.3 allows to generically disable IRQ sources at device level. This
>>>> enables us to share IRQs of such devices between on the host side when
>>>> passing them to a guest. This feature is optional, user space has to
>>>> request it explicitly.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> I just realized something.
>>> With this patch, if guest ever looks at
>>> interrupt disable bit, it will go crazy as that bit goes on/off by
>>> itself. I guess we could have an ioctl to set/clear the bit on
>>> device, and have qemu call that on config write into command/status
>>> register.
>>
>> I understand the problem, but I don't get why the kernel should bother.
>> User space has to filter the config space access, returning precisely
>> the value of the INTx disabled bit that the guest wrote.
> 
> Yes but if guest disables INTx it should not get interrupts :)

Right, got this meanwhile. KVM-in-KVM with nested device assignment
would break otherwise - intolerable. :)

Jan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 259 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-03  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1288771873.git.jan.kiszka@web.de>
     [not found] ` <628f014fb1efb8e2208db03d13198ba301a3a34c.1288771873.git.jan.kiszka@web.de>
     [not found]   ` <20101103082921.GD6772@redhat.com>
     [not found]     ` <4CD123B8.8080607@web.de>
2010-11-03  9:10       ` [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: Allow host IRQ sharing for passed-through PCI 2.3 devices Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-03  9:18         ` Jan Kiszka
     [not found]   ` <20101103084320.GF6772@redhat.com>
     [not found]     ` <4CD1227E.9020908@web.de>
2010-11-03  9:05       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-03  9:15         ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2010-11-03  9:18           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-03 15:57     ` Alex Williamson
2010-11-03 17:27       ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-03 17:35         ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-03 17:42           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-03 17:37         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-03 17:45           ` Jan Kiszka
     [not found] ` <128511f28870098dbd57bdaa081dd30ac2af70df.1288771873.git.jan.kiszka@web.de>
2010-11-03 22:13   ` [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: Switch assigned device IRQ forwarding to threaded handler Marcelo Tosatti
2010-11-03 22:32     ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CD1284F.7070003@web.de \
    --to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.