From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: tomasz.wroblewski@citrix.com,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux-2.6.18: netback: take net_schedule_list_lock when removing entry from net_schedule_list
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 12:09:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CD2945A.4040301@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CCFD63D0200007800020366@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Hi,
On 11/02/10 09:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
> From: Ian Campbell<ian.campbell@citrix.com>
>
> There is a race in net_tx_build_mops between checking if
> net_schedule_list is empty and actually dequeuing the first entry on
> the list. If another thread dequeues the only entry on the list during
> this window we crash because list_first_entry expects a non-empty
> list, like so:
>
> [trace snipped]
I can't find a net_tx_build_mops() function in 2.6.18. I believe I can
see what the patch does (*), but for 2.6.18, I think the consequences of
popping one from an empty list differ from the above.
Therefore, can somebody please describe how to reproduce this bug? What
steps did lead to the NULL dereference in the original 2.6.32 environment?
(*) It takes the locking out of remove_from_net_schedule_list() and
moves that reponsibility to the callers of
remove_from_net_schedule_list(). This is justified by the difference
between call sites: netif_deschedule_work() follows the old behavior,
but poll_net_schedule_list() (and transitively, net_tx_action()) needs
to lock the following together:
- checking for non-emptiness,
- modifying the first element,
- removing the first element from the list.
I think without the patch the race could result in memory corruption
(even if with different consequences than above), but how can one
trigger the race?
Thank you,
Laszlo Ersek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-04 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-02 8:13 [PATCH] linux-2.6.18: netback: take net_schedule_list_lock when removing entry from net_schedule_list Jan Beulich
2010-11-04 11:09 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2010-11-04 11:15 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CD2945A.4040301@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=tomasz.wroblewski@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.