From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pascal Hambourg Subject: Re: rules matching ipv6 prefix addrs Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 21:02:42 +0100 Message-ID: <4CD31162.9080909@plouf.fr.eu.org> References: <4CD12B8B.9090506@plouf.fr.eu.org> <20101103.051925.193703726.davem@davemloft.net> <20101103.145503.104044664.davem@davemloft.net> <5ca75042-e809-4439-856a-e3da43cb6c23@email.android.com> <4CD21679.2070508@zytor.com> <051c8c45-58d9-420c-aa86-41cb0c75a05a@email.android.com> <4CD2C62A.50805@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Jan Engelhardt , David Miller , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: "H. Peter Anvin" Return-path: Received: from poutre.nerim.net ([62.4.16.124]:60800 "EHLO poutre.nerim.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751465Ab0KDUCo (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2010 16:02:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4CD2C62A.50805@zytor.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: H. Peter Anvin a =E9crit : >=20 > Uhm... no. The reason we'll see dynamic prefixes isn't because of la= ck=20 > of address space but because of mandatory route aggregation (which *i= s*=20 > being implemented from the start) -- to keep BGP6 and the core routin= g=20 > tables from melting down. Sorry to be a bit off-topic, but could you (or anyone) please explain the relationship between dynamic prefixes and route aggregation ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-dev= el" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html