From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gandharva.secretlabs.de ([78.46.147.237]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PEIfT-0006ND-HO for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:33:07 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.101] (91-64-127-39-dynip.superkabel.de [91.64.127.39]) by gandharva.secretlabs.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E24351B10C0B for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:34:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4CD3CF1E.4040804@freyther.de> Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:32:14 +0100 From: Holger Freyther User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Fedora/3.1.6-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1288864342-20973-1-git-send-email-eric@eukrea.com> <4CD2FAF0.4080905@freyther.de> <4CD305FC.7070305@eukrea.com> In-Reply-To: <4CD305FC.7070305@eukrea.com> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.46.147.237 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: holger+oe@freyther.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] qt4-embedded: tune QT_ARCH for armv6 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:33:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/04/2010 08:14 PM, Eric B=C3=A9nard wrote: > Hi, ill it be? >> > in the painting engine, from what I saw in the .h, the asm optimisation= s are > only enabled when using ARM RCVT compiler and not when using gcc but I = have > not checked everywhere in the code so I'm not sure of this. that is something else, I also have a partially applied C implementation = that appears to be faster than the brute force armv6 code. One benefit of using armv6 is that the atomic code will use a different implementation (ldrex,strex IIRC instead of swp). In any case please use something like qttracereply to see if passing armv6 is giving any benefit= at all.