Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> Am 05.11.2010 00:25, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>>> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>>> Am 04.11.2010 23:08, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>>>>> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>>>>> rework. Safer for now is likely to revert 56ff4329ff, keeping nucleus >>>>>>> debugging off. >>>>>> That is not enough. >>>>> It is, I've reviewed the code today. >>>> The fallouts I am talking about are: >>>> 47dac49c71e89b684203e854d1b0172ecacbc555 >>> Not related. >>> >>>> 38f2ca83a8e63cc94eaa911ff1c0940c884b5078 >>> An optimization. >>> >>>> 5e7cfa5c25672e4478a721eadbd6f6c5b4f88a2f >>> That fall out of that commit is fixed in my series. >>> >>>>>> This commit was followed by several others to "fix >>>>>> the fix". You know how things are, someone proposes a fix, which fixes >>>>>> things for him, but it breaks in the other people configurations (one of >>>>>> the fallouts was a complete revamp of include/asm-arm/atomic.h for >>>>>> instance). >>>>>> >>>>> I've pushed a series that reverts that commit, then fixes and cleans up >>>>> on top of it. Just pushed if you want to take a look. We can find some >>>>> alternative debugging mechanism independently (though I'm curious to see >>>>> it - it still makes no sense to me). >>>> Since the fix is simply a modification to what we have currently. I >>>> would prefer if we did not remove it. In fact, I think it would be >>>> simpler if we started from what we currently have than reverting past >>>> patches. >>> Look at the series, it goes step by step to an IMHO clean state. We can >>> pull out the debugging check removal, though, if you prefer to work on >>> top of the existing code. >> From my point of view, Anders looks for something that works, so >> following the rules that the minimal set of changes minimize the chances >> of introducing new bugs while cleaning, I would go for the minimal set >> of changes, such as: > > The tested one (on SMP, and UP with and without unlocked ctx switch): > > diff --git a/include/nucleus/sched.h b/include/nucleus/sched.h > index df56417..8888cf4 100644 > --- a/include/nucleus/sched.h > +++ b/include/nucleus/sched.h > @@ -165,28 +165,27 @@ struct xnsched_class { > #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ > > /* Test all resched flags from the given scheduler mask. */ > -static inline int xnsched_resched_p(struct xnsched *sched) > +static inline int xnsched_remote_resched_p(struct xnsched *sched) > { > - return testbits(sched->status, XNRESCHED); > + return !xnarch_cpus_empty(sched->resched); > } > > -static inline int xnsched_self_resched_p(struct xnsched *sched) > +static inline int xnsched_resched_p(struct xnsched *sched) > { > return testbits(sched->status, XNRESCHED); > } > > /* Set self resched flag for the given scheduler. */ > #define xnsched_set_self_resched(__sched__) do { \ > - setbits((__sched__)->status, XNRESCHED); \ > + __setbits((__sched__)->status, XNRESCHED); \ > } while (0) > > /* Set specific resched flag into the local scheduler mask. */ > #define xnsched_set_resched(__sched__) do { \ > xnsched_t *current_sched = xnpod_current_sched(); \ > - setbits(current_sched->status, XNRESCHED); \ > + __setbits(current_sched->status, XNRESCHED); \ > if (current_sched != (__sched__)) { \ > xnarch_cpu_set(xnsched_cpu(__sched__), current_sched->resched); \ > - setbits((__sched__)->status, XNRESCHED); \ > } \ > } while (0) > > diff --git a/ksrc/nucleus/pod.c b/ksrc/nucleus/pod.c > index 862838c..4cb707a 100644 > --- a/ksrc/nucleus/pod.c > +++ b/ksrc/nucleus/pod.c > @@ -276,18 +276,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xnpod_fatal_helper); > > void xnpod_schedule_handler(void) /* Called with hw interrupts off. */ > { > - xnsched_t *sched; > + xnsched_t *sched = xnpod_current_sched(); > > trace_mark(xn_nucleus, sched_remote, MARK_NOARGS); > #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_XENO_OPT_PRIOCPL) > - sched = xnpod_current_sched(); > if (testbits(sched->status, XNRPICK)) { > clrbits(sched->status, XNRPICK); > xnshadow_rpi_check(); > } > -#else > - (void)sched; > #endif /* CONFIG_SMP && CONFIG_XENO_OPT_PRIOCPL */ > + xnsched_set_self_resched(sched); > xnpod_schedule(); > } > > @@ -2174,7 +2172,7 @@ static inline int __xnpod_test_resched(struct xnsched *sched) > int resched = testbits(sched->status, XNRESCHED); > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP > /* Send resched IPI to remote CPU(s). */ > - if (unlikely(xnsched_resched_p(sched))) { > + if (unlikely(xnsched_remote_resched_p(sched))) { > xnarch_send_ipi(sched->resched); > xnarch_cpus_clear(sched->resched); > } > diff --git a/ksrc/nucleus/timer.c b/ksrc/nucleus/timer.c > index 1fe3331..a0ac627 100644 > --- a/ksrc/nucleus/timer.c > +++ b/ksrc/nucleus/timer.c > @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ void xntimer_next_local_shot(xnsched_t *sched) > __clrbits(sched->status, XNHDEFER); > timer = aplink2timer(h); > if (unlikely(timer == &sched->htimer)) { > - if (xnsched_self_resched_p(sched) || > + if (xnsched_resched_p(sched) || > !xnthread_test_state(sched->curr, XNROOT)) { > h = xntimerq_it_next(&sched->timerqueue, &it, h); > if (h) { > > Looks very similar to what I have succesfully been running on top of 2.5.5.2 (aka 2.5.5.3 beta :-) ), except that I didn't change any names (changes makes perfect sense). /Anders