From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 173-11-172-146-houston.txt.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.11.172.146] helo=mail.breakawaysystems.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PERwZ-0007mR-7s for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 20:27:30 +0100 Received: by mail.breakawaysystems.com (Postfix, from userid 1007) id EB5B68BA001; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:26:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (173-11.172.145-houston.txt.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.11.172.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dlambert) by mail.breakawaysystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B95F1487CA for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:26:29 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4CD45A64.7090306@lambsys.com> Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:26:28 -0500 From: David Lambert User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4CD43116.5020304@lambsys.com> In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 173.11.172.146 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: dave@lambsys.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Random problems with building locales X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 19:27:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Khem, Thanks for your reply. Is there a quick workaround? Is there an earlier branch/tag that is more stable? Regards, Dave. On 11/05/2010 02:19 PM, Khem Raj wrote >> I think its because qemu-arm is dying on you. there is 0.13 release >> that happens few weeks back >> I am still working on getting that into OE. Once I have that in may be >> it will get fixed I am not sure yet >> remain tuned >> >> -Khem >> >>