From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: Philip Rakity <prakity@marvell.com>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@csr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: agressive clocking framework v9
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 10:37:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CD7C4DB.7070105@stericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimWg_EE+hg__b0NW792szvY+4Rc_4XsjbHN_tJv@mail.gmail.com>
Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> So the decision whether to enable clock gating for SDIO should not be
> static (eventually. I'm not saying this is something Linus should take
> care of in his patch, it's up to us to make this work). By default,
> SDIO clock gating should be disabled, but we need to allow drivers to
> explicitly enable it if supported.
I currently (patch v8) disable gating for all SDIO cards,
but I guess there are two approaches to cases where you'd
like to enable it:
- Card (including SDIO device) whitelisting.
- Host whitelisting - for the case where as gateable SDIO
device is soldered to the bus.
The first looks like big-ish so would be a separate patch, but a
host flag for the latter like MMC_CAP_GATE_SDIO can easily be
folded into a v10 of this patch.
Is that desireable?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-08 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-06 5:38 [PATCH] mmc: agressive clocking framework v9 Philip Rakity
2010-11-06 17:24 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-06 17:38 ` Philip Rakity
2010-11-07 1:44 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-11-07 18:18 ` Philip Rakity
2010-11-08 4:33 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-11-08 9:40 ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-08 9:45 ` Philip Rakity
2010-11-09 10:29 ` Jaehoon Chung
2010-11-09 16:52 ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-07 9:32 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-08 9:37 ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2010-11-08 9:47 ` Philip Rakity
2010-11-08 10:40 ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-08 18:49 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-11-08 22:06 ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-08 18:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-11-08 9:23 ` Linus Walleij
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-04 11:16 Linus Walleij
2010-11-04 13:15 ` David Vrabel
2010-11-04 14:25 ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-04 17:01 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-11-05 8:35 ` Linus Walleij
2010-11-05 10:03 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2010-11-04 21:20 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CD7C4DB.7070105@stericsson.com \
--to=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@csr.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=prakity@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.