From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (hermes.mlbassoc.com [64.234.241.98]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F904C803D6 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 06:23:48 -0600 (CST) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 999) id 4D38D16607E1; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 05:23:47 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on hermes.chez-thomas.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from hermes.chez-thomas.org (hermes_local [192.168.1.101]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D512016607DE; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 05:23:46 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <4CD7EBD2.5000403@mlbassoc.com> Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 05:23:46 -0700 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-2.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Tian, Kevin" References: <4CD550D9.30601@mlbassoc.com> <625BA99ED14B2D499DC4E29D8138F1504D190FD7B0@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <625BA99ED14B2D499DC4E29D8138F1504D190FD7B0@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> Cc: Poky Subject: Re: Crazy QT packaging X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:23:48 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/07/2010 12:29 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote: >> From: Gary Thomas >> Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2010 8:58 PM >> >> I just tried to install 'fotowall', a QT application. Much to >> my surprise, a whole bunch of QT packages were installed, many >> of which I have no need and don't understand why they are "required". >> >> In particular, the examples and demos, plus QT-designer (I have >> no development tools installed on my platform). >> >> Any ideas why this happens? how to fix it? >> >> Install log is attached. >> > > qt4.inc recommends all packages but some of them should be selectively > depended by actual recipe. Could you report a bug for it? Done. Bug #524 > BTW, fotowall doesn't really work yet. There're several hard bugs reported around > fotowall, e.g. 348, 349, 336, 280, ...) Thanks for the info - I just picked 'fotowall' as an example Qt application. Of course, now I have the whole example/demo set loaded... :-) -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------