From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from starfish.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.166]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PFcf1-0000gu-VS for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 02:06:08 +0100 Received: (qmail 26120 invoked by uid 1003); 9 Nov 2010 01:05:09 -0000 Received: from adsl-75-37-22-143.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net (HELO ?192.168.1.148?) (philip@opensdr.com@75.37.22.143) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 9 Nov 2010 01:05:09 -0000 Message-ID: <4CD89E41.5000909@balister.org> Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 17:05:05 -0800 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Fedora/3.1.6-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <20101104082759.GG19934@excalibur.local> <20101107182029.GP6691@excalibur.local> In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 216.168.135.166 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: philip@balister.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Patchwork cleanup weekend in two days X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 01:06:09 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/08/2010 06:53 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07-11-10 19:20, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > >> As a side note the patchwork installation will move to our OSUOSL server. The >> new installation will not hold the old patch history we have right now. This >> should be taken as motivation to clean up the rest we have in there. :) > > When will the OSUOSL instance start logging patches? If the patch > history is lost, will the userdatabase be moved over? The user database has more spam accounts than real users. Philip