From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51964 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PFhHi-0001V8-Qd
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 01:02:23 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>) id 1PFhHh-0000lH-7m
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 01:02:22 -0500
Received: from tama500.ecl.ntt.co.jp ([129.60.39.148]:61151)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>) id 1PFhHg-0000kN-Le
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 01:02:21 -0500
Message-ID: <4CD8E3E4.8010500@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:02:12 +0900
From: Yoshiaki Tamura <tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20101108190253.560821111@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20101108190253.560821111@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [patch 0/3] block migration fixes
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Liran Schour <LIRANS@il.ibm.com>

Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Following patchset fixes block migration corruption issues.

Hi Marcelo,

Thanks for looking into this issue.  Although we tried your patches, we're still
seeing the corruption.  If we execute block migration while copying a file
locally, md5sum of the copied file doesn't match with the original.  Sometimes,
the filesystem returns an I/O error.

Could you let us know how you tested and debugged?  Did you use blkverify?

Thanks,

Yoshi