From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
Subject: Re: Re: pvops kernel branches - 2.6.36 options,
	stable/next/etc?
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 18:26:20 +0800
Message-ID: <4CD921CC.3000605@debian.org>
References: <AANLkTi=AZw8_XJbO=fMD5nfp6Mp9QvWaxRPE8Z7nzq42@mail.gmail.com>
	<4CD84C1C.3090703@goop.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CD84C1C.3090703@goop.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 11/09/2010 03:14 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 11/08/2010 10:19 AM, Bruce Edge wrote:
>   
>> Is there now or will there be a 2.6.36 stable branch, or is the only
>> option for this version the next-2.6.36 branch?
>>     
> No.  xen/next-2.6.36 doesn't exist any more, and it never really
> contained anything useful.  xen/next-2.6.37, however, is closely
> tracking upstream and I hope will reach functional parity with the
> 2.6.32-based branches.
>   
So, you do believe that it's not too late so that mainline 2.6.37 will
include the backend drivers for HDD? If so, that's great!

Thomas