From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Fix srcu struct leakage
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:30:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CD95AF0.4010406@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CD955AA.8040604@siemens.com>
On 11/09/2010 04:07 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> > kvm_iommu_unmap_guest enters SRCU critical section, and "struct kvm" is
> > freed at the end of kvm_arch_destroy_vm. Thats why its not in generic
> > code.
>
> The problem is the arch-specific allocation of the kvm object on IA64.
> All others simply call kmalloc/kzalloc for the struct itself, but IA64
> embeds it into some larger context. Not sure why, though.
ia64 virt is special - the guest has a virtual address space for host
data. This data is shared with the host address space, but on different
addresses.
I guess to reduce tlb costs ia64 kvm uses a large order allocation for
both struct kvm and other random data, which is why the allocation is
different.
It could be refactored to something like
#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_SPECIAL_KVM_ALLOC
static inline struct kvm *kvm_arch_alloc_vm(void)
{
return kzalloc(...);
}
static inline void kvm_arch_free_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
{
kfree(kvm);
}
#endif
and have ia64 provide its special stuff. The practice of duplicating
common code just because of one outlier is bad, there are better ways.
(and I will accept untested ia64 patches provided kvm-ia64@ is copied).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-09 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-09 11:41 [PATCH] KVM: Fix srcu struct leakage Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 13:30 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 13:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-11-09 13:59 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 14:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-11-09 14:07 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 14:30 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-11-09 14:36 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 16:00 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 14:05 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 14:00 ` Avi Kivity
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-07 12:58 Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CD95AF0.4010406@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.