From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: of_match_table on non-DT builds Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:27:10 -0600 Message-ID: <4CD9684E.7080606@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Grant Likely Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Grant, With the of_match_table pointer only enabled with CONFIG_OF in struct device_driver, all drivers will have to have #ifdefs around their of_match_table if you want to build them for non-devicetree platforms. This is just the tip of the iceberg as all probe related OF calls have to be ifdef'ed. Is this the intention? Rob