From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CA34C80B6B for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 07:58:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from ALA-MAIL03.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-mail03 [147.11.57.144]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oAADwA1d013768; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 05:58:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ala-mail06.corp.ad.wrs.com ([147.11.57.147]) by ALA-MAIL03.corp.ad.wrs.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 05:58:09 -0800 Received: from [128.224.146.67] ([128.224.146.67]) by ala-mail06.corp.ad.wrs.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 05:58:09 -0800 Message-ID: <4CDAA4F0.1060802@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:58:08 -0500 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9pre) Gecko/20100217 Shredder/3.0.3pre ThunderBrowse/3.2.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kumar Gala References: <414DA7D8-2E3E-4DEE-9C36-24EF976D7A99@kernel.crashing.org> <4CDAA03C.8090004@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <4CDAA03C.8090004@windriver.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Nov 2010 13:58:09.0873 (UTC) FILETIME=[4ED36410:01CB80DF] Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: TARGET_FPU for mpc8315e-rdb listed as SPE?? X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:58:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10-11-10 08:38 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 10-11-10 01:46 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: >> Why does the meta/conf/machine/mpc8315e-rdb.conf list TARGET_FPU as >> SPE. This isn't correct for an MPC8313 SoC. > > It isn't used at the moment, so we can safely > ignore this. > > It was a hold over from when I initially created > the BSP, and I've since changed it locally, but > haven't sent the updated BSP yet. To clarify on this point, the kernel configuration is NOT using SPE for this, and I was attempting to use the FPU setting to trigger some different gcc flags during development the base of that test was an e500 board, so the SPE setting leaked in, but is unused. At the moment, it is actually using soft-float, and I had planned to submit a change to clarify that. If there's another option, let me know and I'll rebase my patches and change it again. Cheers, Bruce > > Cheers, > > Bruce > >> >> - k >> _______________________________________________ >> yocto mailing list >> yocto@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto >