From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: more fixes and cleanup to AMD Fam10 MMCONF enabling
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:22:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDAF0D8.1000100@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CD7BD310200007800020E13@vpn.id2.novell.com>
On 11/08/2010 12:04 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 05.11.10 at 18:51, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On 11/05/2010 03:59 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Unfortunately it turned out the original code had more issues: We want
>>> to place the region above 4G in any case (even if TOM2 isn't enabled
>>> or invalid), and the base mask definition was improperly typed (thus
>>> causing shifts by FAM10H_MMIO_CONF_BASE_SHIFT to produce other than
>>> the intended result). Fixing this in turn allowed simplifying the MMIO
>>> region detection code, as regions ending below TOM2 now aren't of
>>> interest anymore.
>>>
>>> This will only apply cleanly on top of yesterday's patch titled
>>> "x86-64: fix and clean up AMD Fam10 MMCONF enabling".
>>
>> I don't think we have systems that have Enable bit set, but TOM2 < 4G.
>
> I suppose that's true, but making the kernel independent of
> BIOS flaws (especially when it's that cheap) seems like a good
> idea to me. But of course, if that's what would be hindering
> acceptance of the patch, I'd re-submit with that part dropped.
I'm ok with your change.
Please come out one updated version with meaningful MACRO.
Thanks
Yinghai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-10 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-05 10:59 [PATCH] x86-64: more fixes and cleanup to AMD Fam10 MMCONF enabling Jan Beulich
2010-11-05 13:07 ` Andreas Herrmann
2010-11-05 13:13 ` Jan Beulich
2010-11-05 17:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-11-08 8:04 ` Jan Beulich
2010-11-10 19:22 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-11-08 16:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-11-08 16:43 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CDAF0D8.1000100@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.