From: DDD <dongdong.deng@windriver.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: dzickus@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: avoid calling arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() at the same time on SMP
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:51:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDBBCA5.50306@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101111092301.GD18789@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Dongdong Deng <dongdong.deng@windriver.com> wrote:
>
>> +static int backtrace_flag;
>
>> + if (cmpxchg(&backtrace_flag, 0, 1) != 0)
>
> Sorry to be a PITA, but i asked for test_and_set() because that's the simplest
> primitive. cmpxchg() semantics is not nearly as obvious and people regularly get it
> wrong :-/
As the 'backtrace_flag' could be accessed by multi-cpus on SMP at the
same time, I use cmpxchg() for getting a atomic/memory barrier operation
for 'backtrace_flag' variable.
If we use test_and_set, maybe we need smp_wmb() after test_and_set. (If
I wrong, please correct me, thanks. :-) )
Should we still need to use test_and_set?
If need, I will use test_and_set at my next patch.
>
> Also, variables that cmpxchg or test_and_set operates on need to be long, not int.
Got it, I will change it to 'unsigned long' type.
Thanks for your teaching.
Dongdong
>
> Ingo
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-11 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-11 2:20 [PATCH] x86: avoid calling arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() at the same time on SMP Dongdong Deng
2010-11-11 9:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-11 9:51 ` DDD [this message]
2010-11-11 10:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-11 11:00 ` DDD
2010-11-11 9:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-11 9:57 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-02 18:16 Don Zickus
2010-11-10 7:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-10 8:35 ` DDD
2010-11-10 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-10-11 10:31 Dongdong Deng
2010-10-18 11:00 ` DDD
2010-10-18 18:03 ` Don Zickus
2010-10-21 5:17 ` DDD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CDBBCA5.50306@windriver.com \
--to=dongdong.deng@windriver.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.