From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: Virtual interface as AP
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:00:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDC213D.5090407@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101111150634.288980@gmx.net>
On 11/11/2010 07:06 AM, "Lorna Gonz?lez" wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I finally got a station an a virtual AP working on the same channel using the setup below. I made some test sending TCP through iperf between the AP and the station and the VAP to a station associated with it.
> Using an AP operating with Ieee802.11n, an atheros AR928X and without virtual interfaces I get a max throughput of 50 MBits/s.
> As soon as I start using my desired setup, the thoughput of the station is about 15 MBits/s... I actually need to make the rate fixed using iwconfig to get this max. Otherwise the traffic is sent at 1 MBit/s.
>
> Can someone please tell me how is the behaviour of the rate control in case of virtual interfaces on mac80211?
Can you give a more detailed description/diagram of your virtual AP setup and
network throughput test? It sounds like you are using the same radio as AP
and STA? If so, then of course you are going to get less bandwidth on the
VIFS because they have to share the radio.
I'm not sure it should drop all the way to 15Mbps, though. We haven't done a lot of throughput
testing yet, but if we use two STA vifs on the ath9k box connected to an 80211n AP (trendnet),
then we can set a max of about 9Mbps tx + rx across each STA (the STAs are sending to each other).
That is around 40Mbps total tx + rx across the radio.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-11 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-28 7:47 [ath9k-devel] ath9k: Virtual interface as AP "Lorna González"
2010-10-28 8:03 ` Jouni Malinen
2010-11-11 15:06 ` "Lorna González"
2010-11-11 17:00 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2010-11-12 9:21 ` "Lorna González"
2010-11-12 17:22 ` Ben Greear
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-10-31 21:48 "Lorna González"
2010-10-27 14:11 "Lorna González"
2010-10-27 14:24 ` Mohammed Shafi
2010-10-27 14:29 ` "Lorna González"
2010-10-27 14:42 ` Mohammed Shafi
2010-10-27 14:56 ` Peter Stuge
2010-10-27 15:02 ` Jouni Malinen
2010-10-27 16:32 ` "Lorna González"
2010-10-28 7:36 ` jean-pierre cartal
2010-10-27 11:11 "Lorna González"
2010-10-27 12:03 ` Jouni Malinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CDC213D.5090407@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.