From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:40:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PGb8G-0003dX-Gt for dm-crypt@saout.de; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:40:20 +0100 Received: from rain.gmane.org ([80.91.229.7]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:40:20 +0100 Received: from zkaspar82 by rain.gmane.org with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:40:20 +0100 From: Zdenek Kaspar Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:40:04 +0100 Message-ID: <4CDC2A74.1000602@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] Improving performance? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de Dne 11.11.2010 11:49, Lasse Jensen napsal(a): > Now, what are my options? > > A quadcore CPU like the Q6600 would double the number of cores and > theoretically double the throughput, but at cost of idle power. Note > that the server is idle most of the time. > A core i5. They have AES support in hardware, but it's an expensive > solution and i'm not even sure it has Linux support. > A PCI or PCIe based card, like the HiFN cards, but what card should i > look for and what speed should i expect? > Using the CUDA cores of my nVidia card, but no driver seems to exists > for that. Hmm, maybe another option is change from ie: aes-cbc-essiv:sha256 to something faster, ie: aes-xts-plain[64] ? HTH, Z.