From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388F34C80B6B for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:46:47 -0600 (CST) Received: from ALA-MAIL03.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-mail03 [147.11.57.144]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oAC1kknX004583; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:46:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from ala-mail06.corp.ad.wrs.com ([147.11.57.147]) by ALA-MAIL03.corp.ad.wrs.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:46:45 -0800 Received: from bruce-ashfields-macbook.local ([128.224.143.18]) by ala-mail06.corp.ad.wrs.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:46:45 -0800 Message-ID: <4CDC9C83.7020506@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:46:43 -0500 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Saul Wold References: <4CDC8704.9020506@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4CDC8704.9020506@linux.intel.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Nov 2010 01:46:45.0872 (UTC) FILETIME=[76BFBF00:01CB820B] Cc: Yocto Project Discussion Subject: Re: Recipes updates planned for 1.0 X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 01:46:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10-11-11 7:15 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > > Distro / User Space Folks: > > Attached is a spread sheet that shows the recipes we plan to update for > the 1.0 release. This list is based on the reorganization that will be > coming into master soon and shows that there are 231 recipes that need > updating and another 93 recipes that need some manual investigation due > to the checkpkg task not able to determine the version. I couldn't easily read the CSV in my email, but I scanned for kernel elements. I can't tell, are we updating kexec to 2.0.1 ? If so, that's good. kexec is pretty tightly coupled to the kernel version, I'd suggest doing it last, or not doing it at all. I'm talking less about x86 here and more about non-x86. There are more patches to the 2.0.x version that we can apply in this area, but unless we have a test-per arch, it is more than likely broken. Other related / coupled kernel -> userspace apps appear to be at the correct versions. Cheers, Bruce > > For the first phase, we will focus on updating as many of these that can > be managed, many of these are dot.dot updates and should be easy. The > focus will be on toolchain, core utilities and libraries, along with the > graphics core (Xorg and Qt). > > We will continue to focus on making sure that LICENSE and > LIC_FILES_CHKSUM metadata is correct, along with adding URI checksums. > > Thanks to all for working on this effort.