From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.131]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PHhTt-0005DB-EV for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 19:39:48 +0100 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1PHhSr-0004F9-1B from Tom_Rini@mentor.com for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 10:38:09 -0800 Received: from na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com ([134.86.114.213]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 14 Nov 2010 10:38:08 -0800 Received: from [172.30.80.225] ([172.30.80.225]) by na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 14 Nov 2010 11:38:07 -0700 Message-ID: <4CE02C8A.2040002@mentor.com> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 11:38:02 -0700 From: Tom Rini Organization: Mentor Graphics Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: In-Reply-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Nov 2010 18:38:08.0021 (UTC) FILETIME=[14F45C50:01CB842B] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.94.38.131 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: Tom_Rini@mentor.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: testing branch 2010-11-12 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:39:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/14/2010 11:11 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > 2010/11/12 Cliff Brake: >> testing-next is ready for clean builds. Not many builds succeeded >> last week--I suspect people have been busy: > > Actually my builds also succeeded (apart from the neek one which seem > to require some more love). The autobuilder did it's job quite nicely, > but I was just not around to verify the results and update the page. > The neek requires at least the os2 patch. > > Testing 2010-11-12 gives the same results. updated the testing page. After my first week of doing some testing branch test builds I was thinking, would some form of either automated result submitting or form-based result submitting be a good idea? We could try and use a google doc spreadsheet / form, for example. Thoughts? -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation