From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Taylor Subject: Re: BROUTING VLANS Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:43:27 -0600 Message-ID: <4CE1632F.1080104@riverviewtech.net> References: <0619127E-C439-4A2D-A720-30C5B1FD25FA@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <0619127E-C439-4A2D-A720-30C5B1FD25FA@gmail.com> Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Mail List - Netfilter On 11/15/10 05:02, Asher Awelan wrote: > QUESTION: > Is there a way to broute the vlans to the eth1 interface and not have > to create every interface and register every vlan... or perhaps strip > the vlan id (after logging of course)... It /might/ be possible to strip the VLAN tags and send the traffic on it's way with out the need for all the vlan interfaces. But, I don't know that it will be possible (at least as easily) to re-tag the returning traffic. Something you might consider doing is moving the (un)tagging / trunking in to a user space application that can dynamically add and remove the VLAN tags with out needing kernel support or vlan interfaces. - I'm just typing raw theories out my (you know what) and would have to give this quite a bit more thought. Grant. . . .