From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.cbnco.com ([207.164.182.72]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PIlt3-0006ce-Iw for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:33:38 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cbnco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6538F8575 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:32:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp.cbnco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cbnco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15911-02 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:32:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.20.22.83] (auriga-dmzgw.cbnco.com [207.164.182.65]) by smtp.cbnco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F235898DF8 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:32:32 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4CE411AF.1060804@cbnco.com> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:32:31 -0500 From: Michael Smith User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1289482655-20086-1-git-send-email-msmith@cbnco.com> In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cbnco.com X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 207.164.182.72 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: msmith@cbnco.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usbutils 0.70 & 0.73: don't set DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "1" X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:33:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 5:37 AM, Michael Smith wrote: >> I think it may be leftover from earlier. Let 0.86 build by default. >> Most distros already prefer it. >> > > does it work well with udev 141 ? > some uclibc based distros still use older udev I use udev 141, but not uclibc; it seems to work here. Mike