From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925B84C81002 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:13:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from ALA-MAIL03.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-mail03 [147.11.57.144]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oAI5Dfns007308; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:13:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from ala-mail06.corp.ad.wrs.com ([147.11.57.147]) by ALA-MAIL03.corp.ad.wrs.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:13:41 -0800 Received: from bruce-ashfields-macbook.local ([128.224.143.16]) by ala-mail06.corp.ad.wrs.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:13:41 -0800 Message-ID: <4CE4B603.2030709@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:13:39 -0500 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Darren Hart References: <4CE46608.1010708@linux.intel.com> <4CE4817F.3070007@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4CE4817F.3070007@linux.intel.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Nov 2010 05:13:41.0631 (UTC) FILETIME=[5D98B8F0:01CB86DF] Cc: Yocto Project Discussion Subject: Re: Bugzilla Reorg Take 2 X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:13:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10-11-17 8:29 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > On 11/17/2010 03:32 PM, Saul Wold wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> After reviewing the emails from the first attempt and review bugzilla, >> there are a couple of different approaches that can be taken. It's >> important to note that bugzilla supports 3 layers, Classification, >> Product and Components, version are tracked at the Product level. >> >> Since we have 3 Layers, there are 2 possible scenarios: >> >> This is the Yocto Projects Bugzilla, so each "project" can have it's >> own classification, I am not sure that this is the best since some of >> the projects are pretty flat the extra level does not make sense. >> >> I am proposing the following top level classifications, containing the >> following projects (products/components) : >> >> Yocto Projects > ... >> - Kernel >> - build >> - configuration >> - runtime > > Acked-by: Darren Hart > >> - BSPs >> - by board?? > > Let's start off simple - by board might not scale well. Just "BSP" would > be my vote - Bruce might have additional thoughts. This is the sane thing to do. One category 'bsp'. We can specify the BSP in the subject of the bug. If a bug appears across a class of BSPs or an arch, it gets bumped to kernel runtime and is dealt with there. We've been using this scheme for about 200 supported BSPs, so it should do just fine here as well. Cheers, Bruce >