From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91FFE4C80FA7 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:29:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga101.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Nov 2010 21:29:51 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,215,1288594800"; d="scan'208";a="350236276" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.13.148]) ([10.255.13.148]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Nov 2010 21:29:50 -0800 Message-ID: <4CE4B9CE.6080102@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:29:50 -0800 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100621 Fedora/3.0.5-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Tian, Kevin" References: <4CE46608.1010708@linux.intel.com> <625BA99ED14B2D499DC4E29D8138F1504D31419DC1@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <625BA99ED14B2D499DC4E29D8138F1504D31419DC1@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> Cc: Yocto Project Discussion Subject: Re: Bugzilla Reorg Take 2 X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:29:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/17/2010 09:21 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote: >> From: Saul Wold >> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 7:32 AM >> >> >> Folks, >> >> After reviewing the emails from the first attempt and review bugzilla, >> there are a couple of different approaches that can be taken. It's >> important to note that bugzilla supports 3 layers, Classification, >> Product and Components, version are tracked at the Product level. >> >> Since we have 3 Layers, there are 2 possible scenarios: >> >> This is the Yocto Projects Bugzilla, so each "project" can have it's >> own classification, I am not sure that this is the best since some of >> the projects are pretty flat the extra level does not make sense. >> >> I am proposing the following top level classifications, containing the >> following projects (products/components) : >> >> Yocto Projects >> - Cross-prelink >> - general >> - poky integration >> - Swabber >> - general >> - poky integration >> - Pseudo >> - general >> - poky integration >> - Eclipse Plugin >> - Anjuta Plugin >> - Yocto Image Creator (is this really standalone)? >> - Kernel >> - build >> - configuration >> - runtime >> - BSPs >> - by board?? >> - Test Suite >> >> Yocto Infrastructure >> - Autobuilder >> - Bugzilla >> - Website >> >> Poky >> - Build System >> - bitbake >> - configuration >> - layers >> - general > > is it too subtle here? Just 'build system' may be easier to understand... > Honestly, I am not catching your meaning here. Sau! > Thanks > Kevin > >> - Recipes >> - connectivity >> - core >> - devtools / tool chain >> - graphics >> - multimedia >> - demoapps >> - general >> - Documentation >> - Handbook >> - SDK >> - Security >> - SDK >> - tools >> - general >> >> Comments? >> >> >> -- >> Sau! >> >> Saul Wold >> Yocto Component Wrangler @ Intel >> Yocto Project / Poky Build System >> >> _______________________________________________ >> yocto mailing list >> yocto@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto