From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: MMU: remove 'clear_unsync' parameter
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:42:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CE4D8C9.90302@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101117164903.GE18959@amt.cnet>
On 11/18/2010 12:49 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
bool clear_unsync)
>> +static int FNAME(sync_page)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
>> {
>> int i, offset, nr_present;
>> bool host_writable;
>> @@ -781,7 +780,7 @@ static int FNAME(sync_page)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
>> u64 nonpresent;
>>
>> if (rsvd_bits_set || is_present_gpte(gpte) ||
>> - !clear_unsync)
>> + sp->unsync)
>> nonpresent = shadow_trap_nonpresent_pte;
>> else
>> nonpresent = shadow_notrap_nonpresent_pte;
>
> Its better to keep this explicit as a parameter.
>
But after patch 6 (KVM: MMU: cleanup update_pte, pte_prefetch and sync_page functions),
this parameter is not used anymore... i don't have strong opinion on it :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-18 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-17 4:10 [PATCH v2 1/6] KVM: MMU: fix forgot flush vcpu tlbs Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-17 4:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] KVM: MMU: don't drop spte if overwrite it from W to RO Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-17 15:42 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-11-17 15:57 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-18 7:12 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-18 15:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-11-18 16:41 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-17 4:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: MMU: don't mark spte notrap if reserved bit set Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-17 15:56 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-11-17 4:12 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] KVM: MMU: rename 'reset_host_protection' to 'host_writable' Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-17 15:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-11-17 4:13 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: MMU: remove 'clear_unsync' parameter Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-17 16:49 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-11-18 7:42 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2010-11-18 15:43 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-11-17 4:13 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] KVM: MMU: cleanup update_pte, pte_prefetch and sync_page functions Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-17 16:55 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-11-17 15:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] KVM: MMU: fix forgot flush vcpu tlbs Marcelo Tosatti
2010-11-17 16:26 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-17 17:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-11-18 7:17 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-18 9:32 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CE4D8C9.90302@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.