* raid6 failed due to loss of connection
@ 2010-11-19 12:33 Björn Englund
2010-11-20 5:37 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Björn Englund @ 2010-11-19 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Hi,
I have a raid 6 consisting of 10 drives, 2x5 sata disks. Each set of 5
behind a port multiplier. The port multipliers/disk/drivers are a bit
flaky sometimes and I need to pull the cable between the controller and
port multiplier to get the disks recognized sometimes.
Now after rebooting I can't assemble the array.
mdadm -A /dev/md12, reports that 5 disks are too few to assemble array.
One set of (5) disks says that everything is ok when checked with mdadm
-E, but the other set says that 5 disks are failed.
The first set of 5 disks report this:
/dev/sdax2:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 1.1
Feature Map : 0x0
Array UUID : 557d7924:1c547f1c:d878c05d:5a37cfcd
Name : 12
Creation Time : Sun Oct 18 22:07:52 2009
Raid Level : raid6
Raid Devices : 10
Avail Dev Size : 1953118176 (931.32 GiB 1000.00 GB)
Array Size : 15624941568 (7450.55 GiB 7999.97 GB)
Used Dev Size : 1953117696 (931.32 GiB 1000.00 GB)
Data Offset : 264 sectors
Super Offset : 0 sectors
State : clean
Device UUID : ac9db196:fc239a13:2a44b03b:aa45055a
Update Time : Thu Nov 18 13:17:25 2010
Checksum : d65e4e57 - correct
Events : 6
Chunk Size : 256K
Array Slot : 5 (failed, failed, failed, failed, failed, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Array State : _____Uuuuu 5 failed
other 5 disks report this:
/dev/sdt2:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 1.1
Feature Map : 0x0
Array UUID : 557d7924:1c547f1c:d878c05d:5a37cfcd
Name : 12
Creation Time : Sun Oct 18 22:07:52 2009
Raid Level : raid6
Raid Devices : 10
Avail Dev Size : 1953118176 (931.32 GiB 1000.00 GB)
Array Size : 15624941568 (7450.55 GiB 7999.97 GB)
Used Dev Size : 1953117696 (931.32 GiB 1000.00 GB)
Data Offset : 264 sectors
Super Offset : 0 sectors
State : clean
Device UUID : 2bc9f9dc:efcc4041:8a495b40:ad504353
Update Time : Sat Nov 6 14:56:15 2010
Checksum : 482b7858 - correct
Events : 2
Chunk Size : 256K
Array Slot : 0 (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
Array State : Uuuuuuuuuu
Should I try mdadm -A -f /dev/md12 or do I need to run a create command
to get the array up and running?
I'm in the process of copying the drives so I have a backup in case
something goes wrong with the assembling...
/Björn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: raid6 failed due to loss of connection
2010-11-19 12:33 raid6 failed due to loss of connection Björn Englund
@ 2010-11-20 5:37 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mikael Abrahamsson @ 2010-11-20 5:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Björn Englund; +Cc: linux-raid
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 463 bytes --]
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Björn Englund wrote:
> Should I try mdadm -A -f /dev/md12 or do I need to run a create command
> to get the array up and running?
Doing a create is always the last measure to try. Forcing re-assembly is a
gazillion times safer because you can't get the data-disks in wrong order.
Make sure you have the latest mdadm (3.1.4 I believe) and force-assemble
the array and see if that works.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-20 5:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-11-19 12:33 raid6 failed due to loss of connection Björn Englund
2010-11-20 5:37 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.