From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Digimer <linux@alteeve.com>
Subject: Re: [HOWTO] Running Xen 4.0 host (dom0) with
	Redhat	Enterprise Linux 6 (RHEL6)
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 13:04:55 -0500
Message-ID: <4CE6BC47.1000901@alteeve.com>
References: <20101118200025.GH2754@reaktio.net>	<AANLkTikDmcroOdggVc9aJJ4uZ4TYnvRNbxqBKwgHDMjs@mail.gmail.com>	<20101118203902.GL2754@reaktio.net>
	<4CE6AF0E.30108@alteeve.com> <20101119171155.GF2754@reaktio.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20101119171155.GF2754@reaktio.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>,
	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>,
	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pasi_K=E4rkk=E4inen?= <pasik@iki.fi>
Cc: Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@SoftDux.com>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, xen-users@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 11/19/2010 12:11 PM, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:08:30PM -0500, Digimer wrote:
>> On 11/18/2010 03:39 PM, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote:
>>> Note the kernel reference .config has debugging stuff enabled,
>>> so that will slow down dom0.
>>>
>>> -- Pasi
>>
>> With regard to this;
>>
>> I've been hoping to create a set of updated KVM vs. Xen benchmarks as
>> I've seen this asked for of late and existing data is>3 years old.
>>
>> I would like to get the kernel setup relatively similarly to how it wi=
ll
>> be setup if/when an RPM is provided for RHEL 6.
>>
>> These are the DEBUG entries I found in .config from your tutorial. Whi=
ch
>> are reasonable to set to n/m or just comment out? Did I miss anything
>> else I should change? Again, I'm not looking to optimize, just to get
>> closer to what the final generally available kernel will have.
>>
>
> Yeah, you should definitely disable the various DEBUG options
> for performance benchmarking.
>
> -- Pasi

Thanks, I'm compiling now. If it works, I'll post my patch for=20
review/critique. :P

--=20
Digimer
E-Mail: digimer@alteeve.com
AN!Whitepapers: http://alteeve.com
Node Assassin:  http://nodeassassin.org