From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from starfish.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.166]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJZSg-0004dQ-Ka for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 23:29:43 +0100 Received: (qmail 32125 invoked by uid 1003); 19 Nov 2010 22:28:31 -0000 Received: from adsl-75-37-22-143.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net (HELO ?192.168.1.148?) (philip@opensdr.com@75.37.22.143) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 19 Nov 2010 22:28:31 -0000 Message-ID: <4CE6FA0C.2090801@balister.org> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 14:28:28 -0800 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Fedora/3.1.6-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 216.168.135.166 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: philip@balister.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Revert commit c2c8fe4c5629add94bd0b922f5b3446624a9f4d8 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:29:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'd like to revert commit c2c8fe4c5629add94bd0b922f5b3446624a9f4d8. With this commit my build that includes angstrom-task-gnome.bb fails in a peculiar way. Basically, my process table is filled with a task. Looks like it is trying to run a pkg-config gtk+ operation. This is with angstrom-2010.x and a custom machine very similar to an overo. I realize this is a vague description, but I do not have time to isolate better at this time. Can we go ahead and revert this for now? Philip [1] http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=c2c8fe4c5629add94bd0b922f5b3446624a9f4d8