From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.infrascan.de ([188.40.84.136] helo=infrascan.de) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJnq1-0004RO-RT for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 14:50:46 +0100 Received: from [192.168.178.20] (77-22-235-200-dynip.superkabel.de [77.22.235.200]) by email.infrascan.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 967F21B40D for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 14:50:52 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CE7D1F2.7010305@sensortherm.de> Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 14:49:38 +0100 From: Klaus Schwarzkopf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <4CE64779.3020802@sensortherm.de> In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 188.40.84.136 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: schwarzkopf@sensortherm.de X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: buildserver X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 13:50:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Other good idea is to have sanity checker running once per day too. It > may do next things: > - check recipes syntax > - check thath recipes SRC_URI can be fetched I think, bitbake can easily integrate this two features. For example the new options: --download-only only download the source files for the given recipe --download-only-with-depencies only download the source files for the given recipe and its depencies --check-syntax check recipes syntax What do you think? Greetings, Klaus > - check recipes for security flaws (we have tool already) > - ... > - PROFIT! :) (sorry, just can't not to write this :) >