From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com ([209.85.161.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKoZv-0005Ne-9i for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:50:19 +0100 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so1029447fxm.6 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 00:49:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aLvY0x/ZsXiBvZr3Sp5yldSu4NHIH2HvevediLR4ZHs=; b=QQgEVgj+22qy+4zR1nvx6JzHzeIhNgwswpcq3jCy1Xmi8DCefp8gF/q5xjHScEFHf5 7EYWeMa9YwuVhWJYsICtevqyQ4RHXXGrPlZAGiseQHWqVtokLH6A7XWptzZhJHQ0Gj9i ZcBxNjeaiKDGD6ciQ3xerBNYjPSn2HbvPFfzE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=M4t7tTLyvhmAI3b0xBerZxXddXlTnm+R552PadKDIP8TkFciv64Xwy882FmCrrOnEB Qdpx8QLVWfABr5EeHy0CwUPbYLl/KJOnRixixRHS4oVZrn4EjRp/xnTztOJWNc+2AIIc RYYPoEKBqGGh1DA24sZpiGeHrdO+18jBLPnU8= Received: by 10.223.81.70 with SMTP id w6mr1946051fak.18.1290502146558; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 00:49:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.111.101] (d54C04D68.access.telenet.be [84.192.77.104]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e6sm1670422fav.32.2010.11.23.00.49.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 23 Nov 2010 00:49:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4CEB7FFF.7010703@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:49:03 +0100 From: Pierre Cassimans User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1290436983.22883.5.camel@guesswho> In-Reply-To: <1290436983.22883.5.camel@guesswho> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.161.47 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: cazzeml@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Problems creating image for h2200 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 08:50:19 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/22/2010 03:43 PM, Pierre Cassimans wrote: > I try to bitbake an image for ipaq h2200 but everytime it fails with > following error: > > Collected errors: > * check_data_file_clashes: Package udev wants to install > file /home/pc/oe/build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/rootfs/console-image/etc/udev/rules.d/50-hostap_cs.rules > But that file is already provided by package * > udev-hostap-cs-vcc-workaround > * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package task-base. > * resolve_conffiles: Existing > conffile /home/pc/oe/build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/rootfs/console-image/etc/device_table is different from the conffile in the new package. The new conffile will be placed at /home/pc/oe/build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/rootfs/console-image/etc/device_table-opkg. > * check_data_file_clashes: Package udev wants to install > file /home/pc/oe/build/tmp-angstrom_2008_1/rootfs/console-image/etc/udev/rules.d/50-hostap_cs.rules > But that file is already provided by package * > udev-hostap-cs-vcc-workaround > * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package udev. > > Only change with the master tree is the patch i previously posted about > the udev-compat141 hack for h2200 > > Any Idea? > > Cazze > Ok, if found the problem but need some advice to patch it. It was a double declaration of a file inclusion for the h2200 udev rule 50-hostap It is done in the machine conf by including a recipe that adds the file: MACHINE_EXTRA_RDEPENDS = " udev-hostap-cs-vcc-workaround " and it is done in the different udev packages: do_install_append_h2200() { install -m 0644 ${WORKDIR}/50-hostap_cs.rules ${D}${sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d/50-hostap_cs.rules } Now what is the preferred way so I can patch out the other :-)