From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.cbnco.com ([207.164.182.72]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKuy3-0004JM-Px for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:39:41 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cbnco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8ABB8735F4 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:38:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp.cbnco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cbnco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07871-08 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:38:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.20.22.83] (auriga-dmzgw.cbnco.com [207.164.182.65]) by smtp.cbnco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48FDF870C86 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:38:25 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4CEBDFF0.2070001@cbnco.com> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:38:24 -0500 From: Michael Smith User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cbnco.com X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 207.164.182.72 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: msmith@cbnco.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: BitBake parallel parsing testing X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:39:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chris Larson wrote: > Thanks for your time, and do let me know what you think, either of the > code, performance in general, or the new progress bar (shows an ETA), > or anything else :) On a Xen VM with 3 vcpus, this is just brilliant. I used the default number of parse threads (i.e. 3). The CPUs are pretty much pegged. Mike