From: Christopher J. Morrone <morrone2@llnl.gov>
To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [Lustre-devel] Stripe offset default
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:59:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CEC474B.1010609@llnl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AA2C4DA2-1607-4509-9BF2-7F05A352B269@oracle.com>
On 11/23/2010 01:19 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On 2010-11-23, at 12:49, Christopher J. Morrone wrote:
>> On 11/23/2010 09:20 AM, Eric Barton wrote:
>>> I believe, now that lfs setstripe uses options rather than positional
>>> parameters, that the risk of unintentional errors is much less. But
>>> that still leaves the filesystem vulnerable to na?ve or malicious
>>> users. So I propose that we should continue to check permissions
>>> normally when setting the default stripe _count_, but restrict the
>>> ability to set a specific default stripe _offset_ to the superuser.
>>
>> At the very least bug 18547 MUST be completed before doing this.
>> Lustre's default layout mechanism is too uneven, and leads to too much
>> of a performance problem right now to take away users' only ability to
>> lay files out evenly on their own.
>
> I guess the subtle distinction in Eric's question is for "default striping parameters specified on a directory" and not "striping parameters set on a per-file basis". In IRC I discussed with Eric that it is like that specifying the starting OST on a directory default layout is _probably_ not what a user wants to do.
Ah, ok, I did miss that. I am less opposed to that, since I can't think
of a particularly compelling use case for a fixed offset default on
directories.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-23 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-23 17:20 [Lustre-devel] Stripe offset default Eric Barton
2010-11-23 19:49 ` Christopher J. Morrone
2010-11-23 21:19 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-11-23 22:59 ` Christopher J. Morrone [this message]
2010-11-23 20:21 ` Ashley Pittman
2010-11-23 20:50 ` Peter Braam
2010-11-23 21:47 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-11-24 13:31 ` [Lustre-devel] OST pool administration (was RE: Stripe offset default) Eric Barton
2010-11-24 15:09 ` Peter Braam
2010-11-23 21:40 ` [Lustre-devel] Stripe offset default Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CEC474B.1010609@llnl.gov \
--to=morrone2@llnl.gov \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.