From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (hermes.mlbassoc.com [64.234.241.98]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56714C80BEF for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 06:35:55 -0600 (CST) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 999) id DE4DD16603F6; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 05:35:54 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on hermes.chez-thomas.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8FA516603C5; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 05:35:53 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <4CED06A9.8060806@mlbassoc.com> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 05:35:53 -0700 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Fedora/3.1.6-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joshua Lock References: <4CECEF5D.2040702@mlbassoc.com> <4CECF7F0.3080303@mlbassoc.com> <1290599248.2799.16.camel@scimitar> In-Reply-To: <1290599248.2799.16.camel@scimitar> Cc: poky@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: bitbake package-index broken? X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:35:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/24/2010 04:47 AM, Joshua Lock wrote: > On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 04:33 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: >> On 11/24/2010 03:56 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: >>> With a recent build, bitbake package-index doesn't seem to do anything. >>> e.g. if I look at tmp/deploy/ipk/*/Packages.gz before and after, there >>> are no changes. >>> >>> I tried to build a simple package and add it to my database. Sadly, >>> it's not being updated at all, so the new package does not appear on >>> the board. >>> >>> Any ideas what might be wrong? >> >> A quick check shows that do_build() in the package-index recipe is never >> really run! >> >> I found a workaround by just building an image which has a root file system. >> This also forces a package database rebuild. It would be nice to figure out >> what's broken though (it certainly _used_ to work) >> > > I'm not really familiar with the ipk classes so can't offer a quick > solution, could I ask you to file a bug so that we can track this issue > and assign resources to fix? Done - bug #544 -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------