All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
To: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
Cc: Chris Vine <chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: kernel 2.6.37-rc2 breaks i915 graphics
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:34:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CEFB76F.9020902@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101126102341.6d4188af@schatten.dmk.lab>

Dne 26.11.2010 10:23, Florian Mickler napsal(a):
> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 18:34:23 +0000
> Chris Vine <chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 10:30:43 +0000
>> Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 10:23:44 +0000, Chris Vine
>>> <chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> With kernel 2.6.37-rc2, i915 graphics usually fails on boot-up after
>>>> modesetting with my Lenovo S12 netbook which uses the Intel 945GME
>>>> Express Integrated Graphics Controller.  It displays up to the
>>>> point at which modesetting takes place and then usually goes blank.
>>>>
>>>> There may be some kind of race at work here: first, sometimes
>>>> (maybe 1 times in 4) graphics comes up correctly on a first cold
>>>> boot, but I have never managed to get it to come up on a warm
>>>> reboot. Secondly, graphics can be restored when I know (but cannot
>>>> see) that boot-up has concluded, simply by suspending the laptop
>>>> and then resuming.  Resuming the laptop after a suspend always
>>>> brings up the graphics correctly.
>>>
>>> Add drm.debug=0xe to your boot commandline and compare if there is any
>>> difference between a successful cold boot, a broken cold boot and a
>>> warm boot. Similarly, comparing the output of intel_reg_dumper after
>>> each should yield a few clues as to what stage in the boot process we
>>> fail. -Chris
>>
>> First an additional datum point: 2.6.37-rc1 works normally, so the bug
>> is something introduced between 2.6.37-rc1 and 2.6.37-rc2 (to that
>> extent it may be related to this bug which reports a similar phenomenon:
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/11/21/23 ).
>>
>> Attached is the dmesg output from a successful cold boot with
>> 2.6.37-rc2, an unsuccessful cold boot and an unsuccessful warm boot,
>> each with drm.debug=0xe.
>>
> 
> I trimmed the failure boot logs to the stuff before suspending, in
> order to only compare the boot sequence. 
> 
> Looks like only in failure case there are "pipe b
> underrun" reported...
> In success case, no "pipe b underrun" is reported. 
> 
> Also in success case connectors are probed much more often:
> 
> $ grep drm:drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes dmesg-2.6.37-rc2.succeed  | wc -l
> 76
> $ grep drm:drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes dmesg-2.6.37-rc2.*.fail  | wc -l
> 32
> $ grep drm:drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes dmesg-2.6.37-rc2.cold.fail  | wc -l
> 16
> 
> 
> I could not spot any other differences both failure modes have in common against the success case.
> 
> If Chris (Wilson) doesn't yet know what could be the bug a bisection 
> between 2.6.37-rc1 and rc2 might be helpful. 
> 
>  
>> I can't provide the output of intel_reg_dumper:  I can't compile the
>> latest intel-gpu-tools from git (missing declaration/definition of
>> I915_EXE_BLT).  Probably something in a relevant library is too old.
>>

Reminds me - I need to keep drm_kms_helper disabled for reliable
resume on T61:

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19052
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617809

Zdenek


      reply	other threads:[~2010-11-26 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-21 10:23 kernel 2.6.37-rc2 breaks i915 graphics Chris Vine
2010-11-21 10:30 ` Chris Wilson
2010-11-21 18:34   ` Chris Vine
2010-11-22  8:36     ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-11-26  9:23     ` Florian Mickler
2010-11-26 13:34       ` Zdenek Kabelac [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CEFB76F.9020902@redhat.com \
    --to=zkabelac@redhat.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk \
    --cc=florian@mickler.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.