From: Spelic <spelic@shiftmail.org>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Xfs delaylog hanged up
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 23:43:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CF0380E.5000706@shiftmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CED973B.60102@shiftmail.org>
On 11/24/2010 11:52 PM, Spelic wrote:
> On 11/22/2010 08:27 PM, Spelic wrote:
>> ....
>> I was doing a parallel-kernel-unpack benchmark:
>> ....
>
> I tried to reproduce it today but unfortunately I wasn't able to, not
> even on the same hardware.
>
> The first time it happened so soon after starting such
> parallel-kernel-unpack benchmark (at the second run!) that I was
> confident it was possible to reproduce it easily, but today in many
> hours it never happened again. Sorry. Unfortunately the machine is
> going back to production soon so I'm not sure I can do further testing.
I had another smaller hangup, and unfortunately I wasn't paying
attention. I just noticed that between a zillion runs of the "benchmark"
taking 1 minute (for the part before the sync) I just had one that took
2m30s for the same part. The system was absolutely idle except that test
so I can't really see an explanation other than being another smaller
hangup...
The good news is that it definitely came out of the hangup by itself:
this time I didn't press Ctrl-C. So even if it was an xfs bug it doesn't
seem fatal.
The dmesg this time showed nothing; probably because the hangup this
time was shorter than 120 seconds so the watchdog didn't notice anything.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-26 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-22 19:27 Xfs delaylog hanged up Spelic
2010-11-22 23:29 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-23 11:17 ` Spelic
2010-11-23 13:28 ` Spelic
2010-11-23 20:46 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-23 22:14 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-11-24 0:20 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-24 13:12 ` Spelic
2010-11-24 21:50 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-23 22:48 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-11-24 0:36 ` Spelic
2010-11-24 1:40 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-11-24 6:18 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-11-24 7:44 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-11-24 0:58 ` Spelic
2010-11-24 5:44 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-25 23:34 ` Spelic
2010-11-26 4:20 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-24 22:52 ` Spelic
2010-11-26 22:43 ` Spelic [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-24 4:03 Richard Scobie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CF0380E.5000706@shiftmail.org \
--to=spelic@shiftmail.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.