From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69AFC4C80815 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:52:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Nov 2010 19:52:05 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,264,1288594800"; d="scan'208";a="681416711" Received: from rrsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.0.57]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Nov 2010 19:52:05 -0800 Received: from [10.255.13.188] (10.255.13.188) by rrsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com (10.31.0.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 20:52:05 -0700 Message-ID: <4CF08064.1030604@intel.com> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 19:52:04 -0800 From: Scott Garman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: About autobuilder images X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 03:52:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Meant to cc: the list. Scott -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [yocto] About autobuilder images Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 20:48:35 -0700 From: Scott Garman To: Tian, Kunwei On 11/25/2010 01:55 AM, Tian, Kunwei wrote: > Hi, Elizabeth I find the folder 20101123-1 and folder 20101124-1 are > empty,which from http://autobuilder.pokylinux.org/nightly/. Do you > know what is the matter? And also , I find folder 20101115-1 only > have qemu images,but folder 20101115-2 is ok. What is the different > between folder 20101115-1 and folder 20101115-2? Most likely you're looking at output from a build that was canceled. Previously, the output directories in the web area were only created at the very end of the buildset, and the images copied over in one big step. However, due to the length of time builds were taking and our need to make the images available to QA as quickly as possible, images are now copied over to the web area in several steps (generally as each main machine arch is completed). The -1 vs. -2 directory naming definitely indicates that the first build was originally canceled and a second one was run. To make this clearer, I'm thinking at the start of the build to touch a file named BUILD_INCOMPLETE or somesuch, and then delete that at the very end of the build, to clarify the state of the build. I can probably add this early next week. Scott -- Scott Garman Embedded Linux Distro Engineer - Yocto Project